Crisis Leadership Style
Crisis leadership is a very important part of leading in today's world. The skills a leader needs in order to guide people during a crisis are different from the skills needed to help a group grow. Are you a good crisis leader? What is your leadership style in case of a business crisis situation? A business crisis can test the strongest of leaders, read this article to explore how to ensure you’re ready to take action and weather the storm when one strikes you.
What is Crisis Leadership?
Dealing with difficult situations is an integral part of the job of any leader. You may call such situations as disaster recovery, crisis management; business continuity planning, or organizational resilience, dealing with difficult situations seems an ever-increasing part of a leader’s lot these days. Crisis leadership will become even more important in the future as the nature of crisis changes with the increasing complexities in the world we operate in.
In a moment of crisis, when things seem to be mostly falling apart, the followers turn to its leaders for a sense of reassurance and guidance on how to tackle the situation. These are times when leaders have to be smart about how they present themselves and deal with the crisis. A crisis occurs when policymakers experience “a serious threat to the basic structures or the fundamental values and norms of a system, which under time pressure and highly uncertain circumstances necessitates making vital decisions.” Leaders in such circumstances need to make calculated decisions to improve the chances of survival.
Three elements are common to most definitions of crisis: (a) a threat to the organization, (b) the element of surprise, and (c) a short decision time. In a crisis, leaders are expected to reduce uncertainty and provide an authoritative account of what is going on, why it is happening, and what needs to be done.
Characteristics of Effective Crisis Leaders:
The skills a leader needs in order to guide people during a crisis are different from the skills needed to help a group grow. Some leaders have a flexible style, allowing them to execute one or another style depending on each situation. There is no right or wrong, and the following attributes have been identified by researchers being helpful in the situation of crisis from a leadership perspective:
1. Sense-Making: Leaders need to determine, even in the face of ambiguity and complexity, the likely level and impact of the threat. They need to get a fast and clear grasp of the situation and quickly analyze what’s going on and what needs to be done to take charge.
2. Decision Making: Leaders must make decisions amid conflicting information, values, and risks. They need to evaluate options realizing the importance of time lost in such situations. Finally, they need to make the best decision in a limited amount of time in the given set of constraints.
3. Coordinating: Leaders must recognize that a crisis cannot be managed in a linear, hierarchical fashion. They need to communicate succinctly and effectively about what needs to be done to resolve the crisis. They might need to get into “giving directions” mode, often telling everyone what their role is, what the desired goal or accomplishment is, and the deadline in which the job needs to get done.
4. Meaning Making: Meaning-making refers to crisis management as political communication. Leaders need to offer their stakeholders a coherent and credible account of what has happened. The normal channels of communication may not be operative or may be overloaded, requiring new channels and protocols that must be quickly mastered.
5. Terminating-Accounting: Terminating a crisis is only possible if the leader correctly handles the accountability question. Leaders need to know when the crisis has ended, operationally, and politically.
6. Learning: Leaders need to recognize that there are “lessons to be learned” from a crisis. They don’t dwell on why things happened till the crisis is resolved as they understand that there is little time to blame others for what has already happened and the immediate need of the hour is for action to resolve the problem. But they don’t forget the learning part and find the lessons learned after overcoming the problem to make the necessary changes in the face of a future crisis.
Related Links
You May Also Like
-
Frederick Winslow Taylor started the “Scientific Management Movement”, and attempted to study the work process scientifically. Scientific management, also called Taylorism, was a theory of management that analyzed and synthesized workflows. It is a system for increasing the efficiency of manpower to its maximum potential and streamlining production to improve efficiency. This article explores this theory in more detail.
-
Laissez-faire is a style of leadership that affords the group members a great deal of independence. Tasks are delegated to the group members and they are responsible to see the project through to fruition. Research has shown that this style of leadership leads to the lowest levels of productivity. This article explains this style and covers the implications of having a hands-off approach and the situations where this style could be effective.
-
Bureaucratic leadership relies on a clear chain of command and strict regulations. Bureaucratic leadership style is a very decent style for work involving serious safety risks, such as handling toxic substances, moving large objects. The focus is on compliance with rules and laid down procedures to make sure that the group is doing their job correctly and safely. Learn some advantages and disadvantages of this style and situations in which this style could prove to be effective.
-
Have you ever resonated that there seem to be as many different ways to lead people as there have been great leaders? When we recall the success of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon Bonaparte to Steve Jobs and Jack Welch, we also notice that they all used different approaches that were suitable to their specific situations and circumstances. Over the last century, researchers and psychologists have developed simple ways to describe the “Styles of leadership” and in this section, we will explore these commonly known leadership styles.
-
Crisis leadership is a very important part of leading in today's world. The skills a leader needs in order to guide people during a crisis are different from the skills needed to help a group grow. Are you a good crisis leader? What is your leadership style in case of a business crisis situation? A business crisis can test the strongest of leaders, read this article to explore how to ensure you’re ready to take action and weather the storm when one strikes you.
-
Facilitative Leadership is all about involving the employees in the decision-making process at all levels enhancing their sense of ownership, responsibility, and motivation. Facilitative leadership style uses a number of indirect communication patterns to help the group reach consensus and build commitment for the decision taken. To be effective in modern organizations, managers need to become facilitative leaders, learn what it means to be a one.
-
Adaptive leadership is a style of leadership that emphasizes the importance of each and every person and role within the company. Adaptive leadership views the organization as an ever-changing, living organization, where employees can learn, adapt, and grow. Adaptive leaders mobilize people towards a common goal and also have the courage to experiment with new ideas and approaches. Adaptive leadership is the practice of mobilizing groups of people to tackle tough challenges and thrive. Learn how to adopt this style and how to become an adaptive leader!
-
Participative leadership is one of the most effective styles and creates higher productivity, better contributions from group members, and increased group morale. The democratic leadership style consists of the leader sharing the decision-making abilities with group members by promoting the interests of the group members. Learn more about this leadership style and situations when it is effective.
-
Leadership has been defined in different ways by different sets of scholars. In very simple terms leadership can be defined as the skill of a person to influence an individual or a group for achievement of a goal in a given situation. One can use different dimensions and perspectives to define leadership. Through the evolution of leadership thought, leadership has been defined in various ways discussed here.
-
The ten most important qualities that define a good leader are self-awareness, interpersonal and communication skills, ethical values, organizational consciousness, self-confidence, adaptability and flexibility, imagination and creativity, focus & result-orientation, continuous self-development and accountability and ownership for his actions. These ten qualities of leadership every good leader should possess to a certain extent and must continually strive to develop them.
